Posts from the Brand-tastic Category

Five Day Perspective

March 5th, 2007 by Chief Nut

It’s been five days since our return from the Global Marketing Summit and, as expected, a new perspective is starting to settle in. The trap, of course, is to let complacency take over and to allow “the real world” to consume us. Now is the time to strike at the follow up contacts, and to continue building on the relationships that began this past week.

What lessons were to be learned at the event? The obvious answer would be to list the “who’s who” lineup of speakers including; Shawn Gold of Myspace, Pat Lafferty with Discovery (formerly with Leo Burnett), Todd Cunningham with MTV, Maureen Schumacher with Google, IAB’s Greg Stuart, and many more. The insight and information these speakers provided was inspirational and valuable. They did, however, provide a predictable experience. I expected to be blown away … I expected to learn a lot … I expected to be impressed.

What I didn’t expect was the cab ride from the airport to the hotel. I’m seen here with Mr. Saul White and Lani Voivod of Epiphanies, Inc. In my experience with retaining cabbies, Saul did some things extraordinarily well;

* He engaged us in conversation. OK, that, in and of itself, isn’t extraordinary. The fact he turned a 25 minute car ride into a memorable event was.
* He taught us about the history of the area
* He gave us the lowdown about the hotel we were staying at
* He shared personal stories and anecdotes
* He boldly asked, without being too forward, if we would call him for the return trip (we did)
* He sincerely told us that he looks forward to our next trip and to keep his card

What Saul did was to begin a real relationship … in less than an hour. I can’t picture Saul ever being referenced in the same breath with the phrase “like two ships that pass in the night.” Nope. Like Caribbean pirates, he and his crew would crash their ship into yours, jump the rails to get over to your side and would fire up the party! Thanks for the lesson Saul.

Is your business more like Sauls … or like every other business in your space?

US Air … could learn a lesson.

February 27th, 2007 by Chief Nut

I’m sitting in the Myrtle Beach airport waiting for my delayed flight.  Winding down after 3 days attending the 2nd annual Global Marketing Summit.  LOTS more on that in upcoming posts. 

Being delayed and possibly getting stranded in Washington tonight (I’m on stand by) is the “Bad.”  On the flight(s) down here I was shown both the “Good” and the “Ugly.” 

As I was boarding my connecting flight from Charleston to Myrtle Beach I was shown a FABULOUS example of self-motivated, high-touch customer service.  A gentleman by the name of Niles was the ticketing agent.  As he took the ticket from each person, he did something that I’ve never seen before.  He quickly and deftly noted the name of every person and thanked them by name.  Simple…not in the book…rarely a step agents will take the time to do…HUGE impact on me. Bravo Niles!!  When I get back, I’ll be calling to find out the name of your supervisor and to write a message to United Airlines management.

Here comes the “Ugly.”  Still warm with the glow of Nile’s customer service, I strapped myself into seat 4C …€” the first row in coach with lots of leg room.  Comfy (but captive), I was slapped with a pitch by one of the flight attendants (over the intercom) to sign up for a Visa Card.  WHAT THE …?  Miffed only begins to describe how I was feeling.

When I contact United/US Air, I’ll suggest they visit one of their employees in Charlotte to take a lesson in what makes good customer service!

Cola Wars … Again

February 20th, 2007 by Chief Nut

More on the recent happenings in the Coke-Pepsi battle. In my last post I talked about the impact of DVRs on commercial viewing and that advertisers need to embrace creative approaches, evangelism and customer care. Late last week I compared the brand consistency seen in the latest commercials produced by Coke and Pepsi. Let’s mash these two ideas together, shall we?

Pepsi recently launched a couple of new marketing strategies;

  • Under-the-cap promotions that link the product with microsites giving away daily prizes.
  • Prize code distribution via eNewsletters (Pepsi Xtras and Dewsletter) and Instant Messaging
  • A variety of different treatments to new can labels

Coke … nothing new that I can find

Here comes a HUUUUUGE “however”. If you’re going to create an effective online marketing campaign (Pepsi), you have to make sure ’stuff’ like this doesn’t happen!!! Granted, this happened in 2000 and I shouldn’t even really compare recent good stuff with these older online events, it’s always a good thing to revisit the lessons of the past.

Another Wolf

February 14th, 2007 by Chief Nut

They’re clever, to the point, humorous, tight and entertaining … BUT, they’re more “Pepsi-like” than “Coke-like”. Here’s another commercial to compare to my last post.

A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing

February 14th, 2007 by Chief Nut

Arguably, one of the longest standing, hardest hitting, most brutal of all brand battles; Coke vs. Pepsi.

Coke: Generations of brand power. Tapping into the “Innocent” or “Angel” archetype, we’ve all enjoyed a lifetime of wonderfully warm and fuzzy ‘feel good’ advertising that dips into a deep sense of nostalgia (overlooking that whole New Coke debaucle, of course). Take a look at this fabulous example of Coke in it’s hay day if you need a reminder of why Coke is the powerhouse brand that it is.

Pepsi: Laser focus on the “Jester” or “Trickster” archetype allows this brand to be funky, wacky, funny, playful, bold and brazen. Take a look at an older Jimmy Fallon commercial, as well as the new pinball campaign. It doesn’t get any more “jester” than that!

OK, NOW take a look at THIS commercial and tell me who you think it should be? Wild car rides, edgy CG effects, guys in leather jackets, chaotic action. The lyrics “…you give a little love and it all comes back to you” could be seen as a continuation of brand history, but the overall effect is just too close to the Pepsi brand.

I hope they don’t decide to call it “Newer New Coke.”

Beautiful Brand … Leads to Viral Humor

February 4th, 2007 by Chief Nut

Quickly becoming a classic, Dove’s “Evolution” advertisement taps into the “neighbor” archetype and reinforces the emotional connection by promoting their own social cause, the “Dove Self-esteem Fund.”

A humorous reflection of this fabulous commercial also taps into the humor of “every man” by pointing out the reality that “no one wants to look at ugly people.” Sad (indeed), but true that this kind of message is validated by the reaction of the masses to advertising campaigns. The good news … This kind of humorous view is one way an idea can turn viral.

Here’s an idea for a marketing campaign.
Create both the message AND the viral humor in one fell swoop. Then create a competition to have the ‘real’ viral video makers to top your own effort.

If you haven’t seen Dove’s original commercial, watch it first before you watch this one;

The Color of Vanilla

January 31st, 2007 by Chief Nut

Part 4 of a series on “Defining Online Branding“, by Mihaela Lica, talks about “Color Psychology”.  This is powerful stuff and Mihaela makes some very good points about the impact of color.  HOWEVER, if you read this article as a layman and are seriously in the process of reconsidering the development of your brand, you’re likely going to:

  • Create a light colored background
  • Settle for an airy layout
  • Use a primarily blue logo (not too dark) … Unless you’re in the hospitality or food industry where you’d go with green
  • Avoid oranges and reds altogether

This strategy would lead to a complete lack of differentiation.  The choice of colors in the development of brand is as wide and varied as the companies themselves and the people running them.  IN FACT, I would be so bold as to say that creatively breaking the mold is more powerful than any strategy that dilutes impact or the strength of a powerful emotional connection.

So, how would I modify these suggestions?  Instead of

Green, in its various shades, is perfect
for the hospitality industry, food industry (especially for BIO
products) cosmetic (if we consider Yves Rocher and Garnier) and ecology.”

I’d say something like;

Cool hues of green can be used effectively to support calming emotional connections such as health, innocence, simplicity, a lack of chaos and for companies wanting to create a feeling of strong customer service.  As the green becomes more saturated, it would increase in energy and would lend itself to more energetic emotional connections such as vigor, youthfulness, playful activity and for companies wanting to emphasize the service delivery experience … not so much soothing customer service.

Notice the complete lack of mentioning any particular industry!  It is not only possible for a company to go WILDLY astray (from the norm in their industry) in the development of corporate brand, I would suggest that it’s the only way to clearly differentiate yourself from the pack.  It would be perfectly sound for a hospitality company to create an energetic, orangy-red color palette in development of a brand that connects with a “you’ll have fun when you work with us” emotion.

Mihaela soundly informs us that “color is probably one of the most powerful psychological tools” we have.  I suggest using it to steer your brand toward a powerful emotional connection, but don’t knee-jerk ANY brand element just because that’s the norm in your industry!

Need an example? 
Did you ever hear of Aflac before the duck?  Who would have ever suggested portraying a conservative insurance service in such a wacky, playful manner.  The talking duck works because it’s not the norm.

What about red, green and purple computers?  Apple was bold enough to create them when the norm for every other computer manufacturer on the planet was grey and black.  BRAVO Apple!

Last example … Creating our own heavily textured, black background, with unique torn-paper navigation is probably the best brand move we’ve ever made …€” emphasizing bold, creative “trickster-like” emotional connections.  We get more comments about it (some hate it …€“ most love it) than any of the hundreds of sites we’ve created in 15 years.  I truly believe that with a vanilla design, we would not have experienced the 500%+ increase in revenues that we saw this past year! 

NO MORE VANILLA!  Gimme the pistachio, rocky-road, double fudge with ALL the fixin’s!!!

The “Brand” of an Eagle Scout

January 28th, 2007 by Chief Nut

I was discussing a legal issue with my attorney a few days ago and made the comment that “I just want to ‘do the right thing’” and “would like it if other people had the same standard.” His reply was a real wake up call … he asked, with extreme sarcasm, “would you like a merit badge?” At first I was offended but then it dawned on me that all he meant was the real world is FULL of people who don’t “do the right thing” and to expect otherwise is somewhat naive (sadly).

Take this one discussion and compare it to the values I’m trying to instill in both my boys (12 and 14 years old) AS WELL AS my employees who present my company to the world on a daily basis. It is INDEED a difficult task to always “do the right thing” in business … but without that standard, what happens to the value of your brand?

Jim Collins writes about the “The Value of an Eagle Scout” and comments about the virtues and high standards taught to young boys in the Boy Scouts of America (BSA). Only a VERY small percent ever achieve the highest rank of Eagle Scout (1-4%) — a significant achievement representing years of dedication, committment, community service, learning and pride. Ask anyone familiar with the BSA and they’ll tell you that the brand of the Eagle Scout is indeed one of distinction. Both my boys are involved in the Scouts (I’m the local Committee Chairman) and I will indeed encourage them to try and acheive this highest rank.

Question:
Is your corporate brand worthy of being considered the equivalent of an Eagle Scout?

Team Kool-Aid?

January 27th, 2007 by Chief Nut

The name “Marlboro” won’t be seen in Fomula 1 racing this year. At least not the name. The Ferrari F1 team, however, will still use the other strong visual elements of the Marlboro brand. The Philip Morris company (owners of the Marlboro brand) will continue this policy into the future unless there are attempts to legislate against such “subliminal branding.”

OK … here comes a heated riff!

This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and demonstrates that government legislative bodies have NO CLUE how brands work. Don’t misunderstand what I’m saying. Cigarette smoking and kids don’t mix and we should ALL teach our children about the dangers of that bad habit. That’s not my point. The legislators’ idea, presumably, is that if people don’t see the name (e.g. kids), they won’t be swayed by exposure to the other core brand elements. And, more specifically, it’s a stand on morally high ground to protect our children from the evils of cigarette smoking.

I suggest that the removal of the Marlboro name may actually enhance the strength of the brand, not weaken it. Specifically, the removal of the name is not “subliminal” in ANY WAY. Is it coincidental that you no longer see the Target name in TV advertising? Let’s not forget the obvious removal of the Nike name on the outside of their retail outlets. In each of these cases, the strength of the brand equity built over time is not only strong enough to remove one of the key elements, the process of removing the name from the presentation may actually reinforce the recognition and make the viewer feel “smart.”

In this light, OF COURSE the folks at Marlboro are willing to take this tact. My bet is that they’re sitting around their offices snickering at the Washington bureaucrats for forcing them to do something that they were going to do anyway. They get to be seen as the compliant, dutiful, concerned company all while following a sound brand strategy.

This, of course, holds true until they’re forced to stop ALL advertising. In this case, Altria (the parent company of Philip Morris and Marlboro) would need to effectively swap out Marlboro with one of their other brands. Maybe have the Kool-Aid pitcher guy prancing around the pit stop giving the drivers high fives as they screach to a halt. OOHHH YEAAAHHHH!

No Spinning Please

January 19th, 2007 by Chief Nut

I’ve heard marketers talk about how they’re going to “spin” a campaign. There’s a problem with that line of thinking. It’s short-term and ineffective. Spinning a campaign is NOT likely going to change a company’s brand in any significant way. Here’s Laura Reis’ riff on a recent WalMart attempt at doing just that. A brand, you see, (using Michael Eisner’s words) is “enriched or undermined cumulatively over time, the product of a thousand small gestures.”

branding dog sledIt’s like a pack of wild dogs pulling a sled. If they’re all going in different directions, you’ll get nowhere fast … and adding another dog (with a strong spin) won’t change things. If you get all the dogs pointing in the wrong direction, again, adding another dog won’t likely change the situation. The only way to steer brand is to put in the time, energy and PLANNING to get the dogs to run in the direction you want. The problem with both brands and dogs is they’re both kinda fickle and unpredictable.