<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 23.5 Million Dollars Per Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acorncreative.com/blog/2006/11/01/235-million-dollars-per-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acorncreative.com/blog/2006/11/01/235-million-dollars-per-letter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Chief Nut</title>
		<link>http://www.acorncreative.com/blog/2006/11/01/235-million-dollars-per-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chief Nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acorncreative.com/blog/2006/11/01/235-million-dollars-per-letter/#comment-115</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Mike.  True, true &#8230; BUT, if you&#8217;re going to create a brand that is as successful as YouTube &#8230;€” truly remarkable (a la Seth Godin) &#8230;€” you would be better served with an easy name.  Just another $.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.acorncreative.com/blog/2006/11/01/235-million-dollars-per-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acorncreative.com/blog/2006/11/01/235-million-dollars-per-letter/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Surely blinkx is a search engine that searches other people's sites (youtube, myspace, fox, reuters and hundreds of other tv and web video sites) .. and youtube is a video provider that just searches through its own. Thats the difference. Although blinkx is still pretty difficult to say, I must admit.

Youtube's only minor mistake was to use a name that can be spelt differently. www.utube.com's traffic rankings went through the roof when the google purchase was announced!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely blinkx is a search engine that searches other people&#8217;s sites (youtube, myspace, fox, reuters and hundreds of other tv and web video sites) .. and youtube is a video provider that just searches through its own. Thats the difference. Although blinkx is still pretty difficult to say, I must admit.</p>
<p>Youtube&#8217;s only minor mistake was to use a name that can be spelt differently. <a href="http://www.utube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.utube.com</a>&#8217;s traffic rankings went through the roof when the google purchase was announced!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
